Two Images

I travel from California to Iceland as often as time and funds allow. I have been enough times (5) and spent enough days (nearly 100) to have favorite places. One of the places I return to is Ásbyrgi (Canyon).

Ásbyrgi is a horseshoe shaped canyon carved by a titanic glacial burst or, according to other geologists, repeated, big enough glacial bursts. The canyon walls are vertical lava. Midway down the canyon is an outcrop. I’ve set with a camera aimed at this outcrop on three of the trips. I spent years as a 4×5 inch film photographer so I know how to sit and wait. But no mater how good and eye or how great a subject, the quality of the light will separate good images from little more than records.

My visits in 2006 and 2014 Ásbyrgi were sunny and relatively warm. I get annoyed with sunny Iceland days. The light on sunny days reminds me of Winter light in the Southwest Deserts of the US. Great light at the beginning and end of each day with hard work in between. In 2014 the late in-the-day clouds are a great help.



7006  MG 0852



2014 062O5Q9422  Version 3

The Patent System is Officially Broken

Software, pharmaceutical and some molecular biology patents have strained our current patent system. Many have argued that it may be too broken to fix. It was my impression, wrong it would seem, that more traditional patentents; those based on novel ideas, implentaitons or inventions and involving no algorithms or cell lines were still working. Turns out I was wrong.

From Photography Bay:

Amazon Technologies, Inc. (a subsidiary of, Inc.) has legitimately patented studio the common studio photography method of photographing subjects on a seamless white background using a cyclorama and the USPTO actually granted the patent.

Photography bay includes the Patent illustration of the technique. Amazon has, somehow, patented the standard way that photographers have set up lights for a photo with a bright white background – millions of catalogue images have been shot using exatcly this technique.

This is pure silliness.

On The Death of Everpix

Memo to: Apple

Re: Everpix Shuts Down

I am but a small blog in a sea of bigger and smaller ones. I am a professional photographer that uses Macs and iOS devices (nice job on the 5s camera by the way) along with a collection of digital cameras to make a living.

But, and this matters, I don’t post “real” images on social sites. Hoisting any image on the internet is no different than being willing to give it away. I make a living and devote my working life to taking images that have value. Zero is not value. Other Pro photographers have a different view and have gained (sometimes) deserved accolades by using Social media to get the word out; to show the world what they can do.

I have tens of thousands of photographs – more than would fit on my iPhone or iPad. Photo Stream works, after a fashion, but I need access to my photo library, the entire photo library, when I’m meeting with a client or traveling or…

For the past year or so I’ve had just that, universal access to my images, with Everpix. I gladly paid their subscription price and I gained access to my entire image collection, curated in Aperture and loaded onto Everpix servers. That is ending as Everpix, a great service, failed to gain enough subscribers to keep the servers running and the lights on.

In many ways, Everpix has become what Aperture and iPhoto should be but are not. What appears to be a very sad day for the folks at Everpix and for people like myself, should look like an opportunity to Apple. These folks have dug the trenches and laid the pipe and I’m running out of metaphor here. Buy Everpix, expose millions of people to the idea of “all your images, anywhere” and offer to back up those pictures of Brandon’s or Ella’s or Isabel’s or Mathew’s first steps, High school graduation and candids at their weddings. iPhones have become our casual cameras but we use others. We need a drawer to toss the images in, for the more organized, an album to arrange and annotate them. Everpix was this and iPhoto / Aperture with Photo Stream are clearly not. Hard drives die, phones don’t float and iCloud is not yet up to the task of backing up every important image that we need not to lose.


P.S. Everyday Everpix, with my permission, sent me a few images from the past. The images were arranged by year. This was genius. My Wife and I on vacation, my favorite dog, past and present, a wedding, a commercial shoot or some giant home remodel that isn’t quite finished yet, these are evocative and effective reminders of the passage of time. And they showed up in my inbox everyday.

Updating the Fuji X100 (not the X100s): It’s a big deal.

I’ve written about the Fuji X100. I use the Fuji X100. I may have mentioned, as have others, that it is a flawed masterpiece.

This past week it became a bit less flawed. The X100 was announced at Photokina in 2010; I took custody of mine in early May, 2011. Despite it’s considerable age (in digital terms anyway) Fuji has not forgot about the camera and issued a major firmware upgrade. Focus speed is faster, it focuses closer, AF focus selection finally makes sense and some real effort has gone into making manual focus a viable way to use the camera (it really wasn’t prior to this update.) Focus Peak Highlight, a huge help in manual mode, has made it’s way from the X100s to it’s predecessor.

Good stuff and rare to see such extensive support for a camera long out of production.

I’m a fan of Lens Rentals. I use Lens Rentals to audition a lens before I buy. Sure in theory I could do that locally but only in theory. There are just two camera stores with any significant inventory left in my metorplex and to leave with a lens you will have had to pay for it. Or I can drive into San Francisco and hours later still have to buy a lens to see if it’s worth keeping. At least one of the Bay Area stores charges a hefty restocking fee – so no.

Renting and spending a quality weekend or even a bit longer kicking a lens around a bit (metaphorically) is a very good thing. Also there is that vacation which somehow requires a really long or really wide lens that you don’t want / can’t begin to afford once the fun is over.

And I’ve become a fan of Roger Cicala’s lens reviews and lens vivisections.

Now add to all that an new site, which appears to be the place that LensRental sells off their no longer needed lenses. All the lenses I looked at were used, had a short description of what used meant to that particular lens and rated. You will not find the absolute latest and greatest there but you will find lenses recent, well maintained lenses for a fair price, shipped quickly and I suspect, given everything else I know about the company, the will arrive just as they were described.

Good stuff.


The Part Where I compare it to the Fuji X100

I, along with many others, jumped at the chance to own an EOS M (arriving loaded with the latest 2.x firmware) for a deeply discounted price. It’s a nice camera with a surprisingly  well made, good to good plus STM kit lens – I bought the zoom. Canon, among camera manufacturers, seems almost alone in getting touch right. It’s not Apple good but it’s good enough.The few physical buttons are well made and unfussy. It tears though batteries like a Bugatti Veyron gulps premium gasoline.

And I think it’s too small to handle well. Yes I understnd that there is a race to small in this sort of camera but at the expense of utility and handling? Why?

My problem, and I don’t intend to get over it, is that I also own mirrorless done right – the Fuji X100. It has a lengthy list of idiosyncrasies, a lousy LCD and remarkably fussy buttons. It also has a very nice Hybrid viewfinder,  just a bit more size and the prime Fuji lens. I take pictures and the Fuji is better at taking pictures than the EOS M. I suspect that the Fuji (and it’s siblings) is better at taking pictures than any of the Mirrorless herd. It was designed with a cleaver and entirely successful viewfinder.

The hybrid viewfinder separates the Fuji from the rest of the mirrorless masses. Using the rear LCD is optional so batteries don’t suffer from powering the viewfinder, internals and providing camera shooting information. It is possible to set the Fuji X100 up to take more images than it’s battery would seem to allow by powering down all the standard mirrorless displays and using the viewfinder in optical mode.

The EOS M, and by extension all mirrorless cameras that require the rear LCD to do the heavy lifting, all strain their batteries. Add an electronic viewfinder (EVF) and the battery is officially out of it’s depth.

Size Matters – Too Much

The EOS M body is just slightly larger than the S90 we have here (and by extension the S100 and S110). As good as the S90 (and the subsequent s100 and s110)  is it’s  too small to hold correctly. The EOS M, likewise, is not enough larger to hold well – especially with the zoom. One-half inch on the right side with a bit more bump would solve that… it does with the Fuji x100.

To many a mirrorless camera with interechanagle lenses THAT also fits in your pocket is a design goal, But at the expense of proper handling? Really? After some initial enthusiasm mirrorless sales have tanked. The drop in sales is the result of at least three questionable design decisions:

  1. Relying on “live view” aka the rear LCD panel for framing requires that the camera be held out and away from the body. This is a silly way to hold a camera – especially if it has any weight. A mirrorless camera with a zoom lens will always weigh more than a cell phone.
  2. Leaving out the mirror and the accompanying mechanism, found in a DSLR allows for a significantly slimmer camera. It doesn’t require a tiny camera, just a slim one. Pictures are lost with bad ergonomics. A Canon EOS 1D-X is a brute but it’s a joy to hold and shoot.
  3. An advanced level / pro camera requires a viewfinder. Not an optional one, a built in, integrated, included-in-the-sales-price viewfinder. Fuji has my money for their Hybrid viewfinder. Other manufacturers are welcome to offer an alternative but so far the efforts are weak.

It Stays – For Now

The EOS M has some redeming qualities. It was inexpensive, costing roughly what the STM zoom cost as the “clear the warehouses” sale began. Buy the body, get the lens for free or vice versa.  It shoots nice video and the current generation IS is a genuine help when shooting hand held. The STM kit zoom is nearly silent. Focus is quick enough for my style of shooiting. It’s fine at reasonable ISO’s though the sensor shows it’s age above ISO 1600.

I suspect that, despite it’s tiny size or maybe because of it, the EOS M will spend a fair amount of time on a tripod as a video camera. The stills meet my definition of very good all the way out to ISO 1600 so that may, on rare occasions, be handy (though that argues for the 22mm f/2 pancake and not the “starts at f/4 zoom.)

At one pound 2 oz (.51 kg) for zoom and body, it will be a nice hiking camera.

It’s easy to speculate that all digital cameras will have fewer internal parts going forward. Slapping mirrors may someday seem quaint. Someday, just not yet. Maybe not for a while.

DxO Optics Pro 8.3 released.

I’ve owned and used DxO for years.and It has always been awkward as part of any workflow. That said it does do some things that Aperture does not. DxO pairs camera bodies and lenses and  the result is very accurate automatic vignetting and, thought I don’t see it much, removal of chromatic aberration with minimal collateral damage.

Today’s release of v8.3 marks a bit of a sea change for main stream RAW converters. The new version has added GoPro HD Hero3 and HD Hero2. Also, and this shouldn’t surprise, iPhone 4, 4S and 5 along with the Galaxy S3 and S4.

Odd group for what was known as a RAW tool but a tacit admission that most of the photographs posted to “insert your favorite photo web photo upload site here” originate on phones.

Not the best — the most. I’ve played with JPEG’s in DxO (and other photo manipulation apps) and substantive manipulations are  seriously limited. That said, DxO can now at least get the geometry, vignetting and chromatic aberration under control in on Phones and GoPros.

Since that’s what everyone is using.

Refinance If That’s What it Takes

I’m not a wildlife shooter but I’ve watched in wonder as the Canon 200-400 f/4 IS has gone from rumor to fact. Now a guy who should know has this to say about it:

I can’t say whether it’s worth the price or not, but I can certainly say it’s the sharpest zoom lens I’ve ever seen, with image quality rivaling the most expensive primes.

There is lots more over at in another excellent post by Roger Cicala. And the price, but you probably knew this, is $12,000. Lens case is extra.

On The Hyposcrisy of Google

This is not a link blog and John Gruber will never notice any traffic that bounces off this site to his. But on the off chance you land here don’t linger. Go over to Daring Fireball and read this.

Google is good at what it does. The issue, made crystal clear at the recent Google I/O conference, is that what Google does is carefully and methodically  being separated from what Google says that it does.

Google has become the Borg even as they continue to insist that they are the neighborhood Girl Scout selling cookies.

Adobe CC

Much has been written about Adobe’s switch from “we sell software” to “we lease software.” It’s a discussion worth having.

There have been millions, fine, tens of thousands of comments on the Photography sites that I follow. Few are happy with this heroin inspired “sales”  model. The more cogent comments point out the fact that Photoshop files will unusable if at any time in the future you stop your subscription/lease of their products.


Also, what is to prevent Adobe from raising prices in the future?


But for all the dust that has been kicked up, the new CC way of leasing rather than selling only formalizes what has been true for years. Adobe is largely without significant competition in several key areas (some of the competition bought long ago by Adobe.) Photoshop, which is the lone Adobe product I own, has been moribund for years. It’s bloatware with a God awful interface. It’s evolution, much like MS Office, slowed to glacial long ago.

Photoshop has been the Devil for years. But it’s a fairly capable Devil and one that we know.

I started pealing away from Adobe when they bought GoLive and then let it die. Fine, maybe it deserved to die but lots of folks had web sites that used GoLive and Adobe didn’t give a rat’s behind. They did offer a discount on Dreamweaver and that just rubbed salt.

With the killing of GoLive (and much of Macromedia’s catalogue of apps) it occurred to me that Adobe was clearly not a company that deserved my money. Adobe made some of the better to best tools but they were always priced at a premium level while, especially in recent years, they were not evolving as premium level tools should.

So, separate price, separate lease vs buy and any other argument that folks have made about this switch, it’s Adobe that is the problem.

I’m done.